Skip to main content

What the B2B Content Marketing Survey 2012 DOESN'T say


This month saw the release of the annual B2B Content Marketing Survey by Marketingprofs and the Content Marketing Institute. It’s a great benchmark of content marketing engagement globally with some useful insights (most notably the uptake in video usage).

For me though, what is more interesting is what it doesn’t say.

The headline stat is nine out of ten B2B marketers are using content marketing to grow their businesses.

While 9/10 marketeers THINK they are using content marketing...

....I can’t help but question whether they truly are.

  • Just because you produce white papers, doesn’t mean you are content marketing. I’ve lost count of the number of white papers I’ve seen that are essentially flimsy, thinly veiled sales pitches of little value to anyone.
  • You have an agency placing lots of articles. Great for SEO. Your prospects might find you but will they WANT to buy from you?
  • Even case studies are often below par. How X company implemented X solution in 12 months, without any DETAIL about the true pains that it helped to solve, an insider perspective of the journey they took, challenges encountered along the way and how they were overcome?
  • Headlines are one dimensional with no hint of a benefit to the end user and categorised by format type (blog, video, white paper) not grouped by content theme, pain or stage of maturity.

True content marketing is:

  • Creating content that TRULY ADDS VALUE to the target audience without selling (immediately that is)
  • Offering specific information, not vague, rambling waffle
  • Being selective about what is good content, not just churning out any old stuff (anything to keep it going)
  • Recognising that you can’t expect there to be a silver bullet in the shape of one type i.e. a blog or e-newsletter or social media. The reality is they’re interdependent.

There is no better example than Eloqua – the champion of content marketing. After all content fuels the very product they sell. Nevertheless the team there took some very bold decisions not least to:

- carve out an entirely new niche – Revenue Performance Management (normally reserved for  the analysts)

To do this they invested heavily in a content marketing centric approach which included some very important maxims:

Create valuable content NOT marketing collateral

Go after something you know you’d pay for, then give it away for free

Results were almost immediate with a surge in awareness and a spike in engagement. But one of the most notable results is a $2.5M attributable sales increase, from just one content series – the grande guides. Way to go guys. (NB: the Case for Content is a really useful document detailing their journey – check it out)

If you're not getting the results you expect from your content marketing programme, ask yourself the question - are we truly doing content marketing or do we just think we are?

Then you can take those vital steps towards addressing it....

Read more posts on:


Comments

#1 replica purse to take huge

replica purse to take huge discount rRdNNpPF http://replicapurses.mysbrforum.com/

#2 You may able to get maximum

You may able to get maximum benefit from the content marketing but if you must have to do it in the right way with unique and quality content each time becasue content will help you to rank well in the SERPs.
software application development

#3 Hi Joe - thanks for

Hi Joe - thanks for commenting. Yes - please don't get me wrong. I too think Joe and Ann did a great job with the survey. It's a benchmark and works really well for that. As a typical planner - I always jump to the why behind the questions! Surveys usually only throw up more questions you want answered!

Interested to hear your take on content marketing. It's a tricky one because as you say it is so broad. But I find it difficult to disassociate channels like social media from content marketing because building compelling content is just one part of the mix - ensuring that it's visible is the other and that's where the channels come to play. I suppose our take is that actually 'content marketing' is really just marketing communications generally but with the underlying principle of content being the glue behind it all - rather than a sales biased marketing approach. And on that basis it's no wonder that the survey would be skewed!

#4 Thank you for the shout-out

Thank you for the shout-out Lucinda. We (Eloqua) truly try to stick to that vision (create something someone *would* pay for, then give it away for free). Our biggest motivation is the recognition that we are adhering to that goal, so this post is tremendously inspiring for us.

Regarding the 2012 survey, I think Joe and Ann did an excellent job at mining for patterns. Sometimes I feel like "content marketing" is too broadly defined. For example, I wouldn't include "social media" in content marketing (after all, social media is a channel, not a type of content), nor would I include physical events (content marketing can be used to augment physical events, but the event itself is not exactly a type of content). I find myself wondering if a too-broad definition skews studies (makes people *think* they are doing content marketing when, in fact, they aren't).  What's your take on the definition?

Yours,

Joe Chernov / @jchernov / Eloqua

#5 Thanks for commenting Joe.

Thanks for commenting Joe. Wise words as always. Look forward to more progress in 2012.

#6 Hi Lucinda...of course, you

Hi Lucinda...of course, you are correct.  I'm positive most of the people surveyed are actually not doing content marketing, even though they believe they are.  Same goes for any type of marketing for that matter.  That said, content marketing has come a long way...with still an even longer way to go.

Keep shining a light on this stuff.

Best

Joe

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

You

Us

Content Services

Knowledge Bank

Get in touch